Sixteen sites - 15 chosen to be dismissed
One problem the University faced when it decided to push forward its Heslington East plan was that current planning advice to councils demands that they must only allow academic development on Greenbelt land if there is no alternative.
The University’s Outline Planning application presented a 60 page document on the alternatives. Sixteen sites were appraised. However, that document is a transparent attempt to substitute quantity for quality.
The great majority of the alternative sites were never going to make a short list and should have been dismissed within minutes. Rufforth? Strensall? Tadcaster? Selby? Church Fenton? Naburn Hospital? These sites, and indeed the great majority of the 16 were clearly straw men, chosen simply to give the exercise a feeling of thoroughness.
Even one of the three finalists, Elvington, could hardly have been a serious candidate with its poor transport links. York Central was dismissed, for among other things, that building a new campus there would split the campus. Well if that was to be the crucial criterion then 14 of the 16 sites could be excluded immediately.
|